School Choice Victory at Supreme Court Will "Advance Black Lives"
Discriminatory Blaine Amendments Denied Educational Opportunities to Families in Need
Style Magazine Newswire | 7/1/2020, 5:17 p.m.
"This is a start in the right direction," said Project 21 member Marie Fischer, a former Maryland school board candidate. "Parents should not be penalized because they feel their child would receive a better education at a religious-based institution. For those who say education is a right, can't it be that a quality education is a right?"
In an amici curiae (or "friends of the court") legal brief that Project 21 joined, the justices were told that "denying parents their preferred educational option simply because their desired school has a religious affiliation inflicts direct and significant injury on parents and children." It added that "[r]eligious discrimination is particularly pernicious when it intersects with a fundamental liberty interest like directing children's education." The brief claimed that the government's interest in indirectly funding a religious school is "miniscule."
The Center for Education Reform coordinated the brief that Project 21 joined. It was written by Paul Clement, a former solicitor general of the United States. Other groups joining the brief include the American Legislative Exchange Council, Jack Kemp Foundation and Catholic Charities DC.
Project 21 Co-Chairman Stacy Washington, a former member of a Missouri school board, added: "Almost 20 years ago to the day, in the Mitchell v. Helms decision, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a majority opinion that held that taxpayer money could be spent to aid parochial schools. It is a sad commentary that it took the Supreme Court this long to address the rights of poor children to access the same quality of educational options that wealthy families enjoy."
Members of the Project 21 black leadership network cannot comment on election issues in any way, shape or form as such behavior constitutes "campaign activity" under section 501(c)(3) of the IRS code. Please do not ask Project 21 members questions about election-related issues, and do not anticipate a response if such questions are asked.
Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research. Its members have been quoted, interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992. Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated, and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21.
Founded in 1982, the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations.