Originally Published: 13 MAR 23 14:38 ET

By Tierney Sneed and Ariane de Vogue, CNN

(CNN) -- Several media organizations asked a federal judge on Monday to publicly announce his plans to hold a hearing Wednesday in a blockbuster medication abortion case after the judge reportedly moved to keep the hearing under wraps.

"Across the ideological spectrum, the public is intensely interested in this case," the organizations wrote in their letter to US District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk.

The case concerns a challenge brought by anti-abortion doctors and medical associations to the federal government's 2000 approval of a drug used to terminate pregnancies. Medication abortion is the most common method of abortion in the United States.

"The Court's delayed docketing of notice of Wednesday's hearing, and its request to the parties and their counsel not to disclose the hearing schedule publicly, harm everyone, including those who support the plaintiffs' position and those who support the defendants' position," the media outlets added.

The letter pointed to reporting by The Washington Post on Saturday that said on Friday, Kacsmaryk held a private phone call with the lawyers in the case and told them he was scheduling a hearing for Wednesday but not announcing those plans on the case's docket until Tuesday evening. The judge reportedly told the lawyers not to publicize the hearing plans in the meantime.

Kacsmaryk is currently considering the plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction that would "withdrawal or suspend" that approval while the lawsuit plays out.

If the judge grants the request to block access to the drug nationwide, it could make the pills harder to obtain even in states where medication abortion is legal.

The media outlets told Kacsmaryk that the "Court's attempt to delay notice of and, therefore, limit the ability of members of the public, including the press, to attend Wednesday's hearing is unconstitutional, and undermines the important values served by public access to judicial proceedings and court records."

Kacsmaryk's courtroom is in Amarillo, Texas -- a division in the northern Texas panhandle that is a several hours' drive from Texas' biggest cities and accessible only by a limited number of direct flights.

According to the Post, Kacsmaryk told the case's lawyers he was holding off until Tuesday to announce the Wednesday hearing to limit the potential for protests and disruptions to the proceedings.

"The Court cannot constitutionally close the courtroom indirectly when it cannot constitutionally close the courtroom directly," the media outlets wrote.

"The United States Supreme Court has made clear that, because of our historical tradition of public access to judicial proceedings, and because of the structural necessity of such access to ensure government transparency and accountability, the circumstances in which a courtroom can be closed without violating the First Amendment and common law rights of access are rare."

The organizations signing onto the letter are the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The Washington Post, NBCUniversal News Group, ProPublica, Inc., Texas Press Association, The Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas, The Markup, and Gannett Co., Inc.