Woodward's revelations raise disturbing questions about Trump

CNN/Stylemagazine.com Newswire | 9/5/2018, 12:32 p.m.
Bob Woodward's charges that top national security staff find themselves compelled to protect the world from President Donald Trump should, ...
Bob Woodward's new book -- "Fear: Trump in the White House" -- exploded onto the political scene on Tuesday morning.

Analysis by Stephen Collinson, CNN

(CNN) -- Bob Woodward's charges that top national security staff find themselves compelled to protect the world from President Donald Trump should, in any normal time, precipitate an almost unprecedented national emergency.

The revelations, in the veteran reporter's new book, are so stark and shocking because they flesh out a narrative that the President's critics have long advanced -- that he is simply not fit, by intellect, temperament and knowledge, to be the most powerful man in the world.

For any other President, such charges would trigger a national debate, action from within the administration to address the national crisis and perhaps hearings on Capitol Hill, even compered by the President's Republican allies. Certainly, any conventional commander in chief would be pitched into an immediate political crisis and might see his approval ratings splinter.

Yet the lesson of Trump's presidency is that controversies that would hollow out a normal White House often leave him untouched. At least they don't alter the political realities that prop up his rule --- a loyal, immovable base of grassroots voters who embrace his aggressive attempts to discredit any person or organization that attempts to judge him and a Republican Party unwilling to risk its own fortunes by crossing him.

The question now is, does that equation hold -- following Woodward's reporting? After all, his account is based on the judgment of top administration players themselves that there is an "unhinged" "liar," a "fifth grade" intellect and an aggrieved and abusive "Shakespearean king" raging in the Oval Office.

A President, who prizes loyalty and self-image above all, is left exposed and isolated in his own White House, viewed with contempt by those who serve him and open to ridicule by others who see his swaggering, domineering brand as a front for inadequacy.

The most serious question raised by Woodward's new book is the idea that the people in the Situation Room alongside Trump view him as so lacking in sophistication and judgment that they take extreme measures -- described as an "administrative coup d'etat" -- to sidestep the threat they perceive he poses to national security.

Given the rich texture of a book stitched with conversations and comments from top officials that drip with disdain for the President, there must be significant doubt whether top White House and administration staffers can just brazen out the storm and go on as before.

While some critics have questioned Woodward's methods in the past, his credibility of a lifetime of reporting, and the sheer volume and staggering nature of the revelations contained in "Fear: Trump in the White House," are strong arguments as to its authenticity.

Trump responded to the crisis by adopting the aggressive methods he always uses to rebut criticism and by living up his maxim to hit back hard.

But there was also a surreal twist to his push back -- as he tweeted out denials to bizarre allegations that he used offensive language to describe his Attorney General and highlighted take downs by conservative media.